tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5429305915843274151.post7524611832636652942..comments2008-09-14T21:20:51.638-04:00Markhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13534096073937573676noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5429305915843274151.post-60330718193024006652008-09-14T21:20:00.000-04:002008-09-14T21:20:00.000-04:00Barr never was a Libertarian. He is an insult to true libertarians. He is an opportunist who is using our party for his own gain.<BR/><BR/>I find it amazing that he got the nomination. It is also a sad day in the history of the Libertarian Party.<BR/><BR/>He will have thousands of libertarians voting against him.<BR/><BR/>Libertarians against BarrAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5429305915843274151.post-21280636417730001622008-09-04T15:24:00.000-04:002008-09-04T15:24:00.000-04:00Your blog made me very happy to hear I'm not the only one who thinks Barr is hardly Libertarian. Anyone who supports international interference, the invasion of privacy in the Patriot Act, anti-drug, anti-freedom of religion in the military, and so-on, is no advocate for individual rights. I would have never voted for this hypocrite if it were done on paper instead of the 'pay-for-your-vote' convention held.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5429305915843274151.post-42862899303792197872008-03-26T12:27:00.000-04:002008-03-26T12:27:00.000-04:00Barr sounds like he has similar positions on issues that Ron Paul does. Everything should be up to the states, except abortion - that should be banned at the federal level. And anything else he wants banned he'll amend the constitution for. This is a real question about what libertarianism really is. I think it comes down to pre and post civil war and the 14th amendment. Im for the post civil war interpretation. Paul and Barr seem to be for the pre civil war. I think they lost, they should accept that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com